Hello All,
A 'Friend' of mine has suggested we re-fight the battle of the Teutoburg Forest in September as something fun to do.
Since he's a Germanophile, I call him a 'friend' as opposed to a friend as I'm sure which side I'll be on
Anyway I'm wondering if there's any thoughts on what we should use to represent this battle.
Paul suggested we play length ways across the table with the Romans needing to get from one side to the other and the Germans having a good field day along the way.
Any thoughts on this?
Some thoughts that I've had:
We could have something like 20 totally random ambush markers along the way, with differing quantities and qualities of Germans in each ambush.
For purposes of this battle the Germans are considered all "Medium Infantry"
The Roman army must remain in column until contacted by enemy.
No 'army morale'. The Romans start off as (mostly) 'Armoured/Superior/Drilled/-/Impact Foot/Skilled Swordsmen' go to 'Armoured/Average/Drilled/-/Impact Foot/Swordsmen' once 1/3 of the BG's are destroyed or double that number fragmented or a combination of each and go to 'Armoured/Poor/Drilled/-/Impact Foot/Swordsmen' when >1/2 if in a similar way.
Winning conditions:
If >25% of the Romans get off the far side of the table (in any condition) Roman tactical victory.
If >50% of the Romans get off the far side of the table (in any condition) Roman decisive victory.
If ANY Romans get off the far side of the table (in any condition) but <25% German tactical victory.
If No Romans get off the far side of the table German decisive victory.
Please - this is a work in progress, so let me know your thoughts.
Ian
Battle of the Teutoburg Forest
Moderators: terrys, philqw78, rbodleyscott, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators
Battle of the Teutoburg Forest
Viking (15mm)
Syracusan (15mm)
Palmyran (10mm - 15mm basing)
Horse Nomad (15mm)
Syracusan (15mm)
Palmyran (10mm - 15mm basing)
Horse Nomad (15mm)
-
- Master Sergeant - U-boat
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:32 pm
- Location: Dixie
Keep the Germans as HF except they don't suffer any penalties in woods and other terrain. Keeps it simple. Also, this was a coalition of tribes some of which might have been MF.
I'd probably add some units representing baggage along the route of march to act as mobile FOG camps the loss of which represent a small point loss for the Romans and a major point gain for the Germans.
If you can make it a multiplayer game I'd have players represent different tribal groupings and Roman officers. The German players would be competing with each other for points through looting baggage except for Arminius who would gain most of his points from killing Romans. As for the Romans I'd probably have two sets of objectives: one for the army getting off the table as you propose and another set where army losses exceed say 25% at which point it becomes a free-for-all and each Roman officer should get points for getting his command off the board at any point.
Julian
I'd probably add some units representing baggage along the route of march to act as mobile FOG camps the loss of which represent a small point loss for the Romans and a major point gain for the Germans.
If you can make it a multiplayer game I'd have players represent different tribal groupings and Roman officers. The German players would be competing with each other for points through looting baggage except for Arminius who would gain most of his points from killing Romans. As for the Romans I'd probably have two sets of objectives: one for the army getting off the table as you propose and another set where army losses exceed say 25% at which point it becomes a free-for-all and each Roman officer should get points for getting his command off the board at any point.
Julian
-
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 6:02 pm
- Location: Lost Angeles
I played a Lake Trasimene (SP?) scenario where some of the Gaulic battlegroups on the Cartho side started within flank charge range of the Romans.....Immediately meant some Romans where getting smacked right off. If you give hte Romans the full Arm, Ssword, Impact, Sup, DRilled Kitchen sink classification it may be hard for the germans to whack them, even in the woods.
Ian
Ian
You could always say that Ssword only counts for steady units. Since the Romans will mostly be hit in the flank they will be disrupted. If they survive the initial rounds of combat and are morale subsequently recovers, the Germans should be in trouble.IanB3406 wrote:I played a Lake Trasimene (SP?) scenario where some of the Gaulic battlegroups on the Cartho side started within flank charge range of the Romans.....Immediately meant some Romans where getting smacked right off. If you give hte Romans the full Arm, Ssword, Impact, Sup, DRilled Kitchen sink classification it may be hard for the germans to whack them, even in the woods.
Ian
Julian
-
- Corporal - Strongpoint
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:20 pm
Or just say that not every single Roman legionary unit is veteran. The average ones are not nearly so tough, without the Skilled Swordsman.
Also, it seems from a cursory examination of the Wikipedia article that there may have been some fortifications involved at the end, when the Romans are trying to fight their way out of a narrow gap.
Plus you need 3 days tramping through forests in the pouring rain to run down Roman morale a bit.
John
Also, it seems from a cursory examination of the Wikipedia article that there may have been some fortifications involved at the end, when the Romans are trying to fight their way out of a narrow gap.
Plus you need 3 days tramping through forests in the pouring rain to run down Roman morale a bit.
John
-
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:01 pm
- Location: Wheaton - Suburb of Chicago