There's no standalone DPRK campaign in 2.0. You WILL fight alongside DPRK troops later in Chinese campaign though. Hope it's not too much of a spoilers =)

Haha, yeah, it's a tough one. Tbh, I never got DV there, but I believe Akkula tuned it since early test version... But it's very doable and destroying supply bases can give you some, albeit short, advantage.

This change won't hurt RPG units much, imo. It will just limit their craziness against units in close terrain, which is a great change for sure - RPGs are way too easy solution do dig out even infantry units inside the cities. As for ATGM... well, personally I do not like their current form, but Akk...

Hurray!

Thanks Akkula for your hardwork and we finally can get a grip over Chinese armed forces =) I'd say there's number of very challenging scenarios and new campaign is really nice extension ^.^

Modern Conflicts nation tally stands at 71 based on latest string.ini available to me. Don't know if there's hardcoded limit, but I believe Akkula mentioned some troubles with sides/nations on one on these MdC-related topics. Though, personally I see no big problem merging USSR/Russia units for exam...

That works too, especially since I can narrow down the time when they are available as a bonus. Good idea, thumbs up. Just thinking out loud: In original PzC and Akkula's Soviet Storm there were "elite" units ("Guards" in latter case) - fully upgradeable but non-purchasable unit...

You can make them SE units maybe? Or "bonus", which added to core, but you cannot purchase them. So they can gain experience and heroes, but you cannot spam these elite soldiers.

Hi, CaptainLaG. Unfortunately, it's rather unavoidable bug than intended feature. PzC engine don't really designed to handle ranged air units, and defending fighter deal zero damage due to range conflict. To make things worse, even if you try to defend your bomber with ranged fighter it still will b...

Let's say that, as a player, I would be displeased to have my poor passive 1 AA attack be used instead of the massive AA attack of the patriot/S-300 that could be right next to my unit :mrgreen: But indeed, MANPADS don't match the scope of Akkula's campaigns. LMAO, that is for sure displeasing :mrg...

I agree with you, these units should not have too big a role :!: ....But...there are numerous photos and videos that prove that this unit has its usefulness. (Think of the Stinger in the hands of the Afghan Mujahideen) In any case, this unit brought a certain fun factor to the game, I simply could ...

I also think that manpads should be included in the MC program, and of course I'm not as much of a master as Akkula, but I did try my hand at a Manpad Strela-2. I gave it the ability “camo” in the device file, which was a real surprise when they appeared. You can only see them if you stand right ne...

As far as I'm aware, Soviet Storm campaign and standalone scenarios works perfectly well with 1.32. Only "The Motherland Calls" big scenario is glitching like crazy on script side. Though I do not remember "stable" .exe version it work well with. ps: I believe Akkula had plans to...

Another question: "how do I make sure when I purchase naval version of air units, that those are capable of sinking submarines ?" If you take the naval anchor with the attack sign, there is no 100% certainty. For instance, the Tupolev Tu-22M3 ("heavy aircraft" class) cannot atta...

a) In scenario 15 when I have to evacuate units from UK, I discovered a British submarine with a nuke/radioactive marking, have those submarines special functions (it is not the usual split between submarine hunters and those capable of attacking ground units). Is it a special ability (nuking an en...

Having the same issue (probably after the latest patch) - launcher just freeze up and do not respond to anything.

BUT if I put steam into offline mode everything works just fine.

outofspace1 wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 3:26 pm How do I get Nagorno-Karabakh in the 1.95 mod? In 1.90 I see this

It is available through standalone scenarios, Ossetia-Georgia, I believe.

Oh, awesome news and welcome back in action, nikivdd!

Birgeria wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 2:27 pm An early VVS jet fighter Su-9. The profile is very like Me-262.

It is mostly Me-262 - one airframe built based on actual Messerschmidt blueprints. Not to be confused with later "true" Su-9 developed by Sukhoi and introduced in late 50s.

ps: awesome models as always, Birgeria =)

It's been a while since I played NATO campaign that far... but if I recall: 1. Challenger-2's - they used to be the best MBTs in NATO roster AND have 6-hex movement on top of it. Back it up with strike aircrafts and you have fast rolling punch; 2. You can upgrade aux units - changing regular Infantr...

Looks lovely! New roads too from what I can see?