Division D

Challenge for :

- Barrold713 (Dacian 89-106 AD + Sarmatian 25-375 AD), Password=sarmatian, PM Sent

Division D

GeneralKostas (Byzantine 551-578 AD) beat Doyley50 (Roman 24-196 AD) 46-19

After the league matches are done, we have to set up friendly matches to test out things. I know for sure I need to learn how to counter those darn samnite medium infantries :? If any of you feisty Div D folk want a practice match, I'm up for it as Div A is proceeding at nice slow and stately pace....

(...) The square between your cavalry and the Italian foot is rough terrain. So you charge from a rough terrain. Rough terrain moderately disorders mounted troops (-22%). (edit) btw manual, p. 91 about 'Close Combat on the Edge of Terrain' : "If troops inside a terrain feature are in close combat w...

The Italian Foot was in open terrain. I tested an attack with my Veteran Armoured Cavalry to check the statistics and i saw that my cavalry (in open terrain) was moderately disorder (-22%).

Can you explain that?

Division D

Challenge for :

- ggarynorman (Palmyran 258-273 AD), Password=palmyran, PM Sent

Division D

Challenges for:

- SawyerK (Pyrrhic 280-272 BC + Samnites 355-272 BC), Password=samnites, PM Sent
- Spacemonkey76 (Gallic 100-50 BC), Password=space, PM Sent

Division D

Challenges for:

- ggarynorman (Jewish 64 BC-6 AD), Password=norman, PM Sent
- Macedonczyk (Indo-Greek 175 BC-10 AD + Kushan 130 BC-476 AD), Password=kushan, PM Sent

Division D

Challenges for:

- Barrold713 (Roman 199-106 BC + Pergamene 262-191 BC), Password=barrold, PM Sent
- bomber23 (Samnite 355-272 BC + Gallic 300-101 BC), Password=bomber, PM Sent
- grumpydaddy845 (Greek 680-461 BC), Password=daddy, PM Sent


Let's have a nice and competitive matches!!!

The game is very good. I don't argue. I just posted a thought.
Of course it is logical and historical. And it is up to you how to confront with the pursuers behind your lines.

Have a good day!!

I have noticed so far, that a pursuer unit ignore the enemy ZOC and pursue the unit behind the enemy lines. The result is to have an enemy unit in the rear of the battle line and threat us. I am sure that many other players have noticed that. Is it possible to fix that in the next update? My proposa...

Army list

1. Carthaginian 340-281 BC + Greek 460-281 BC allies
2. Indo-Skythian 95 BC-50 AD + Indian 500 BC-319 AD allies
3. Achaemenid Persian 460-420 BC
4. Latin 490-338 BC + Gallic 390-301 BC

Army list:

1. Byzantine 551-578 AD
2. Ostrogothic 493-561 AD + Frankish 496-599 AD allies
3. Hunnic (Sabir) 463-558 AD
4. Avar 553-557 AD

Happy holidays to everyone

Indian archers come in two forms, the light infantry and the massed archers. The light archers can skirmish but they can't do a lot of things. Massed archers shoot at long range with the equivalent effect of light archers at short range, so unlike light archers their fire can be quite effective eve...

Division D

Unfortunately i am going to keep the wooden spoon one more time

phoyle3290 (Lombard 568-569 AD) defeat GeneralKostas (Frankish 496-599 AD with Breton ally) 62-47

See you in the next season

It's best to avoid lancers if you're using impact foot. The exception is if you can pin them into a prolonged melee, but even then, there's an uncomfortably high chance of suffering a disruption or the dreaded instant fragmentation during the charge. If you absolutely have to go toe to toe with lan...

Division D for Diligent Barrold713 (Palmyran) defeats General Kostas (Frankish) 62-47 It was a tough linear and balanced battle. But seeing the superiority of the Palmyran cavalry in my right flank, i planned to lead the game to a marginal defeat and get 1 point with my superior warbands in the lef...

In two occasions my warbands hadn't impact capabilities against cavalry in melee. Is it possible an impact foot unit to loose its impact role in the battle?

I attach two screenshots from the league games in Late Antiquity.

Division D

Garokan (Roman 425-492 AD) beat GeneralKostas (Frankish 496-599 AD with Breton ally) 46-15