Division E General Kostos Assyrian 681-609 BC vs Angel42052 Median 626-550 BC with Cimmerian 750-600 BC allies Score 61-60 A formidable opponent! General Kostos was ahead most of the game. I got a few lucky die rolls towards the end. GeneralKostas please. It isn't so difficult. The score is 60-61

Division E

GeneralKostas (Lydian 687-571 BC + Greek 680-461 BC) defeated SawyerK (Median 626-550 BC + Cimmerian 750-600 BC) 60-38

In both matches, the Lydian spearmen prove their value in the battlefield.

Division E

Challenges for :

- BobGanoush (Fatimid Egyptian 978-1073 AD), Password=fatimid, PM Sent

- Darkwater247 (Alan 651-1049 AD), Password=darkwater, PM Sent

While I've never sat down and tested to confirm them, these are my observations based on my experience thus far. As I recall, evaders can move diagonally. LF can pass through 1 rank of other troops if they are perpendicular. Pursuers are rather unpredictable in my experience. Their first priority i...

Division E

GeneralKostas (German 933-1049 AD + French 888-1049 AD) defeated Barrold713 (Dailami 928-1055 AD + Armenian 885-1044 AD) 66-52

A hard fight until the end.

(3-1)

Division E

Challenge for :

- SawyerK (Lydian 687-551 BC + Greek 680-461 BC), Password=lydian, PM Sent

Why the Mede spearmen haven't impact capabilities against the Assyrian-style Heavy Chariots? Screen_00000000.jpg Heavy Chariots are counted as "mounted shock troops" (manual 29.4.3/14.2.4) Almost all types of infantry (except deep pike) have their impact POA neglected when they are charging mounted...

Why the Mede spearmen haven't impact capabilities against the Assyrian-style Heavy Chariots?

SSB is back

Badger73 wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 4:04 pm

Division E

Badger73 (Palmyran 258-273 AD) beat GeneralKostas (German 933-1049 AD with French 888-1049 AD allies) 47-6

Wrong topic Badger73. You should post it in the Early Middle Ages winners topic.

My game with SSB is stalled since 29th January. So i ended from the list.

Division E

Challenge for :

- Morat (Georgian 1008-1049 AD + Byzantine 988-1041 AD), Password=morat, PM Sent

Karvon wrote: ↑

Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:27 am

GeneralKostas wrote: ↑

Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:14 am

Is it possible a pursuer unit not to return to the battlefield until the end of the game?

Yes, units evading or pursuing off have a small chance of return each turn. It's not very high, so you shouldn't count on them coming back very soon, if ever.

So, it can be considered as a missing unit.

Is it possible a pursuer unit not to return to the battlefield until the end of the game?

Division E

Challenge for :

- angel42052 (Assyrian 681-609 BC), Password=angel, PM Sent

Division E

Challenges for :

- Badger73 (French 888-1049 AD + Viking 900-1049 AD), Password=french, PM Sent

- Barrold 713 (Dailami 928-1055 AD + Armenian 885-1049 AD), Password=dailami, PM Sent

Division E

Challenges for :

- Spacemonkey (Viking 790-1040 AD + Breton 580-931 AD), Password=viking, PM Sent

- Stormcrow (Norman 923-1040 AD + French 888-1049 AD), Password=norman, PM Sent

Good morning. I am playing the Race for Tunis 1.3 MP Scenario and i have noticed, that i can't attach the two Italian Commanders into the units. The current 2v2 is 1.4 and the Italian commanders are ok there. I have downloaded the version 1.3 from the community content inside the game. Is there a p...

Regular Division 2

Missing Results

1) Rob123 (Roman 313-378 AD) defeated GeneralKostas (Hunnic Sabir 463-558 AD) 63-45

2) Bomber23 (Gallic 100-50 BC) defeated GeneralKostas (Carthaginian 262-236 BC) 61-40

3) Scorched (Magyar 830-1049 AD) defeated GeneralKostas (Bosporan 11-375 AD) 62-58

Good morning.

I am playing the Race for Tunis 1.3 MP Scenario and i have noticed, that i can't attach the two Italian Commanders into the units.