Search found 4 matches

by crazygeorge
Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am
Forum: MILITARY HISTORY™ Commander - Europe at War : General Discussion
Topic: German Grand strategy
Replies: 11
Views: 5083

@ Staufen: That's correct, no labs or subs until 1941. The main goal is to make4 the Allied player spend PP towards repairing a constant air harrasment. The Kriegsmarine will be port-bound until the Italian fleet can land in the Biscay, following a successful North Africa campaign. Granted, such an ...
by crazygeorge
Thu May 15, 2008 8:31 am
Forum: MILITARY HISTORY™ Commander - Europe at War : General Discussion
Topic: 85% Commander review
Replies: 8
Views: 3981

With respect to units maintaning their XP levels I wonder if an 'elite reinforcement' system could work. In essence there could be an additional option in the Repair tab to reniforce a unit with better-than-average replacements but at an increased cost. Playtesting for balance should be conducted th...
by crazygeorge
Wed May 14, 2008 12:13 pm
Forum: MILITARY HISTORY™ Commander - Europe at War : General Discussion
Topic: German Grand strategy
Replies: 11
Views: 5083

Here's another approach: When playing the 1939 scenario as Germany, consider your starting forces as an Army Group building block. The main concept is that you need to upscale your land forces significantly if you want to be ready for Barbarossa by copying the starting forces order of battle. Thus, ...
by crazygeorge
Wed May 14, 2008 11:41 am
Forum: MILITARY HISTORY™ Commander - Europe at War : General Discussion
Topic: 85% Commander review
Replies: 8
Views: 3981

Setting the record straight...

First of all congratulations on a very good game. Just to clarify a few issues with respect to our review, especially the 'story' score... I was expecting more historical events and triggers that have some effect on the overall game similar to what Paradox has done in their Hearts of Iron series. No...

Go to advanced search