>The *fist* step in being professional is looking professional.
Freudian slip, coming from a police officer?
...sorry, too good an opportunity to resist...!
Seriously: everyone is entitled to their opinion, but quite frankly mine is the opposite. I don't give two hoots about the photograhps...they are nice and all to look at, but if they make the rulebook bigger, heavier, more expensive, and harder to navigate (simply becuase there are more pages to flick between) then I think they are counterproductive. As I said, IMO.
Now it will be interesting to see what happens...if an electronic rulebook can add value over and above a paper ruleset - not just in terms of updates, but also in things like better indexing, quick links tro related rules sections in other parts of the book, tooltips on items in the quick-reference section, etc. then it will justify its existence in a positive way. Whether that should be alongside or instead of a paper version is a different question. I'd be prepared to pay for an appropriate device (no I don't want to cart my laptop around!) if I can see it is adding value. How much I'd be prepared to pay depends primarily on whether I see it being also useful for other things, so a good choice of platforms helps there.