Search found 69 matches

by atatnet
Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:02 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Second Move-Further Clarifications Requested
Replies: 7
Views: 1769

Re: Second Move-Further Clarifications Requested

Thank you Blathergut!
That was how we have been playing it, until earlier this week when Interpretation 2 was suggested.

Happy gaming!
by atatnet
Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:47 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Second Move-Further Clarifications Requested
Replies: 7
Views: 1769

Second Move-Further Clarifications Requested

Our group has been playing FoGN since it was published. Now and then some questions crop up and we discussed amongst ourselves then check with this forum. However, recently we find ourselves divided in the following question/situation regarding second move. We used one of the following Interpretatio...
by atatnet
Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:14 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
Topic: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
Replies: 383
Views: 42275

Re: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !

Thank you for the update, JD. Much appreciated.

Would it be possible to release the 'paper' version at the same time as the virtual versions so that those who prefer the paper version wouldn't be left out?
by atatnet
Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:17 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Assault: Line of Sight
Replies: 2
Views: 1126

Re: Assault: Line of Sight

OK. Thanks.

BTW, this is not explicitly stated in the rules. I got initially thought it had something to do with the LOS for Firing.
by atatnet
Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:42 am
Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
Topic: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
Replies: 383
Views: 42275

Re: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !

zoltan-i wish there is a "Like" button next to your post in this forum.
by atatnet
Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:34 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
Topic: Version 2 Poll (Version 2)
Replies: 13
Views: 2387

Re: Version 2 Poll (Version 2)

Well, the actual cost of FoGA V2.0 is actually a lot less than $1,000,000.00.
It might be around $454: iPad3 $399 + FoGA for iPad $25.00=$454

For UK players, its worse: iPad3 GBP399+FoGA for iPad GBP25=GBP424.
by atatnet
Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:24 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
Topic: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
Replies: 383
Views: 42275

Re: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !

Look at the bright side of things: if FoG Ancients 2.0 is produced in non-printable digital format, all FoGA 1.0 rulebooks might be collectors items in, say, about 100 years time.
by atatnet
Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:05 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Napoleonic Era 1792-1815 : General Discussion
Topic: Austrian Cuirassiers + Arty: What to Do??!!??
Replies: 38
Views: 3577

Re: Austrian Cuirassiers + Arty: What to Do??!!??

Which Austrian list allows 2 6pak Austrian cuirassiers with artillery attachments in the same division?
by atatnet
Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:19 am
Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
Topic: Tablets for V2
Replies: 59
Views: 7936

Re: Tablets for V2

With all these complaints this really seems to be a huge mistake. Maybe someone had it right when they said Slitherine wants the computer game to take over. Doesn't Ospery have a say in this anymore? In response to irondog068's question about Osprey, the following points are pure speculation, judgi...
by atatnet
Sat Jul 21, 2012 3:21 am
Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
Topic: from FOW back to FOG
Replies: 22
Views: 3034

Re: from FOW back to FOG

Well, Battlefront listened to their customers and did a partial U turn. Now, they only require 50% of the miniatures to be Battlefront miniatures.

As for FoG, maybe they will follow suit and only need 50% of the rulebook to be digital.

If I sound upset, I am. :/
by atatnet
Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:51 am
Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
Topic: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
Replies: 383
Views: 42275

Re: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !

Hey, how about this idea to achieve your digital dreams, Slitherine: Do not waste money bringing out FoG Ancients 2.0 in any form. Let FoG Ancients 1.0 die. Make only FoG Ancients Digital available. Increase the price or put a subscription - only scheme up. Organise online tourneys. This way, we don...
by atatnet
Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:51 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
Topic: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
Replies: 383
Views: 42275

Re: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !

I own 3 iPads: 1 iPad1 and two iPad3s. I have some wargames rules on the iPad in pdf format. It's really a hassle virtually flipping the pages trying to look for certain rules. Even the iPad3 is slow. This deters from the enjoyment playing the game. Furthermore, my physical copies of FoG Ancients an...
by atatnet
Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:50 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
Topic: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
Replies: 383
Views: 42275

Re: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !

I own 3 iPads: 1 iPad1 and two iPad3s. I have some wargames rules on the iPad in pdf format. It's really a hassle virtually flipping the pages trying to look for certain rules. Even the iPad3 is slow. This deters from the enjoyment playing the game. Furthermore, my physical copies of FoG Ancients an...
by atatnet
Fri Jul 20, 2012 7:50 am
Forum: Field of Glory : Napoleonic Era 1792-1815 : General Discussion
Topic: 800 or 1000
Replies: 120
Views: 7654

Re: 800 or 1000

Viperofmilan: interesting points on scenarios. I think FoGN is suitable for both tournament-styles: confrontation (what we have now) and scenario-based (like FoW). Play-testing of different scenarios suitable for tourneys would be great fun and very necessary to produced balanced scenarios. Off the ...
by atatnet
Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:46 am
Forum: Army Design
Topic: French Infantry Corps 1812
Replies: 4
Views: 713

Re: French Infantry Corps 1812

terrys wrote:Unless specified differently all artillery attachments can be allocated to either cavalry or infantry.
They may NOT be assigned to artillery units unless specified as permitted.
As always, thanks for the reply, terrys.
by atatnet
Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:25 pm
Forum: Army Design
Topic: French Infantry Corps 1812
Replies: 4
Views: 713

Re: French Infantry Corps 1812

Thanks for the quick reply. I agree with you...unless the authors comment otherwise.
by atatnet
Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:26 pm
Forum: Army Design
Topic: French Infantry Corps 1812
Replies: 4
Views: 713

French Infantry Corps 1812

Can a core cavalry unit for this army have an artillery attachment?
by atatnet
Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:23 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Firing : Target Priorities
Replies: 36
Views: 2281

Re: Firing : Target Priorities

I quite agree. I don't rememberthis never came up in Beta testing. In theory you can fire with reduced dice it only the centre of your unit can see the target. I will update the errata to add the following: > An enemy unit cannot be fired at unless the firing unit can draw a line to any part of the...
by atatnet
Wed Jul 18, 2012 3:27 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Assault: Line of Sight
Replies: 2
Views: 1126

Assault: Line of Sight

To be able to assault, a unit must be able to 'see' the target of the assault from the starting position. (pg 28, first line) What are the rules for line of sight for Assault purposes? Is a unit able to see through another friendly unit in the open? Examples: 1. Can AAAA see through friendly line in...

Go to advanced search