Thank you Blathergut!
That was how we have been playing it, until earlier this week when Interpretation 2 was suggested.

Happy gaming!

Our group has been playing FoGN since it was published. Now and then some questions crop up and we discussed amongst ourselves then check with this forum. However, recently we find ourselves divided in the following question/situation regarding second move. We used one of the following Interpretatio...

Thank you for the update, JD. Much appreciated.

Would it be possible to release the 'paper' version at the same time as the virtual versions so that those who prefer the paper version wouldn't be left out?

OK. Thanks.

BTW, this is not explicitly stated in the rules. I got initially thought it had something to do with the LOS for Firing.

zoltan-i wish there is a "Like" button next to your post in this forum.

Well, the actual cost of FoGA V2.0 is actually a lot less than $1,000,000.00.
It might be around $454: iPad3 $399 + FoGA for iPad $25.00=$454

For UK players, its worse: iPad3 GBP399+FoGA for iPad GBP25=GBP424.

Look at the bright side of things: if FoG Ancients 2.0 is produced in non-printable digital format, all FoGA 1.0 rulebooks might be collectors items in, say, about 100 years time.

Which Austrian list allows 2 6pak Austrian cuirassiers with artillery attachments in the same division?

With all these complaints this really seems to be a huge mistake. Maybe someone had it right when they said Slitherine wants the computer game to take over. Doesn't Ospery have a say in this anymore? In response to irondog068's question about Osprey, the following points are pure speculation, judgi...

Well, Battlefront listened to their customers and did a partial U turn. Now, they only require 50% of the miniatures to be Battlefront miniatures.

As for FoG, maybe they will follow suit and only need 50% of the rulebook to be digital.

If I sound upset, I am. :/

The future is bleak.

Hey, how about this idea to achieve your digital dreams, Slitherine: Do not waste money bringing out FoG Ancients 2.0 in any form. Let FoG Ancients 1.0 die. Make only FoG Ancients Digital available. Increase the price or put a subscription - only scheme up. Organise online tourneys. This way, we don...

I own 3 iPads: 1 iPad1 and two iPad3s. I have some wargames rules on the iPad in pdf format. It's really a hassle virtually flipping the pages trying to look for certain rules. Even the iPad3 is slow. This deters from the enjoyment playing the game. Furthermore, my physical copies of FoG Ancients an...

I own 3 iPads: 1 iPad1 and two iPad3s. I have some wargames rules on the iPad in pdf format. It's really a hassle virtually flipping the pages trying to look for certain rules. Even the iPad3 is slow. This deters from the enjoyment playing the game. Furthermore, my physical copies of FoG Ancients an...

Viperofmilan: interesting points on scenarios. I think FoGN is suitable for both tournament-styles: confrontation (what we have now) and scenario-based (like FoW). Play-testing of different scenarios suitable for tourneys would be great fun and very necessary to produced balanced scenarios. Off the ...

terrys wrote:Unless specified differently all artillery attachments can be allocated to either cavalry or infantry.
They may NOT be assigned to artillery units unless specified as permitted.

As always, thanks for the reply, terrys.

Thanks for the quick reply. I agree with you...unless the authors comment otherwise.

Can a core cavalry unit for this army have an artillery attachment?

I quite agree. I don't rememberthis never came up in Beta testing. In theory you can fire with reduced dice it only the centre of your unit can see the target. I will update the errata to add the following: > An enemy unit cannot be fired at unless the firing unit can draw a line to any part of the...

To be able to assault, a unit must be able to 'see' the target of the assault from the starting position. (pg 28, first line) What are the rules for line of sight for Assault purposes? Is a unit able to see through another friendly unit in the open? Examples: 1. Can AAAA see through friendly line in...