Search found 58 matches
- Sat Mar 31, 2012 9:49 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Med. vs Heavy Artillery: Difference??
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2288
Re: Med. vs Heavy Artillery: Difference??
Does siege artillery not mean heavy artillery as there is no reference to siege artillery in army lists or glossary at the back unlike rockets and howitzers (possibly for the errata). Oh and please nobody point out the difference between siege and heavy artillery of the period as I am not ignorant o...
- Sat Aug 20, 2011 10:00 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Renaissance Wars : General Discussion
- Topic: how do you stop elite swiss keils?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1477
- Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:54 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: supported arty
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1828
RPHUey wrote: A related question to this scenario which has confused me in the past : When shooting into a supported artillery BG, is the target 1) the artillery, 2) the supporting infantry or 3) shooter's choice? The start of this thread implies that the artillery can be targeted. Shooters choice ...
- Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:52 pm
- Forum: Old Beta Test
- Topic: LT DAG Lists Errors
- Replies: 50
- Views: 4524
Dacian List again
DAG has Falxmen as protected, printed FOG Army list has them as unprotected.
- Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:36 pm
- Forum: Old Beta Test
- Topic: LT DAG Lists Errors
- Replies: 50
- Views: 4524
Dacian & Sarmatian List Querries
Dacian List DAG has captured bolt shooters as drilled, FOG printed army lists have them as Undrilled Later Sarmatian List DAG has foot archers as 0-4, FOG printed army lists have them as 0-12 which translates as 0-6 Sarmatian Allies DAG gives this list scouts Light Horse , FOG printed army lists hav...
- Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:00 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Mixed MF/HF BGs Cohesion Test..??
- Replies: 2
- Views: 820
- Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:40 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Later Tercios (and others)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2621
- Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:56 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Later Tercios (and others)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2621
- Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:30 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Detached Shot: Doesn't Give Protection??
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2161
- Sat Oct 02, 2010 12:27 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Detached Shot: Doesn't Give Protection??
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2161
- Sat Oct 02, 2010 11:03 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Later Tercios (and others)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2621
In my opinion, To your 1st point I don't think that they can expand in close combat neither can any other pike shot formations unless in a single column. To your 2nd point yes, but I would play 2 in the front rank and 1 in the 2nd. To your 3rd point I would say 1st 2 ranks front is front, if nothing...
- Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:51 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Differences Between FoG:AM (v1) and FoG:R
- Replies: 15
- Views: 13128
- Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:42 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Renaissance Wars : General Discussion
- Topic: Grrrrr
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1385
- Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:38 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Early 30 Year Swedes...
- Replies: 27
- Views: 5802
I would take the commanded shot, as David said the Swedish cavalry is flank protection for the foot. Commanded shot with the cavalry make them harder to break down. My brother refuses to fight against the Swedes if I put my commanded shot in with the cavalry. His POV as the German Catholic is can't ...
- Sat Sep 25, 2010 1:38 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Protected Foot
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1596
- Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:03 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Artillery
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1506
- Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:00 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: What is the +4 cost per BG for ETYW Swedes get you?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4497
- Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:49 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: What is the +4 cost per BG for ETYW Swedes get you?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4497
- Wed Sep 22, 2010 5:49 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: What will be the popular lists from the first book?
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12140
Look at page 122 you take the majority armour class in the front rank, if tied you take the lowest so both the early and late tercios are unarmoured for shooting. The exception is the Swedish brigade formation which takes its armour from the front rank of pike which is armoured. This is also on page...
- Wed Sep 22, 2010 5:36 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: What will be the popular lists from the first book?
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12140
Units in Swedish Brigade formation take their armour from the pike so they are armoured whilst the Germans are unarmoured. That is why the Germans are minus at long range but the Swedes are not. As for your other point you are right we were playing it wrong :oops: So 2 rounds at long range yes, but ...