Search found 42 matches
- Thu Mar 12, 2015 3:06 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Internal Ally maxima
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2891
Re: Internal Ally maxima
I can't say because it is for a convention and not all players have chosen their army.
- Wed Mar 11, 2015 10:21 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Internal Ally maxima
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2891
Re: Internal Ally maxima
It does say choose an army based on the maxima and minima in the list below. Does this also apply to an ally general? The ally general and troops are the separate listing for allies where they can either be an ally for this list or selected to support another list.
- Wed Mar 11, 2015 7:38 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Internal Ally maxima
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2891
Internal Ally maxima
I'm doing the list checking for a competition and a player has send in a list with an internal ally. Is he allowed to have more of a particular troop type than the maxima in the main list? The army in question does not specify if the player has to stay within the maxima. Nor does it say you can choo...
- Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:48 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: New player looking for army suggestions
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7198
Re: New player looking for army suggestions
He beat up a Later Polish list last night with the Hungarians. A fun game to watch where both players plans were disrupted by a LH bow unit that held up a LH bow sword unit for many rounds of combat blocking the advance of both armies.
- Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:53 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: New player looking for army suggestions
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7198
Re: New player looking for army suggestions
Sirius used the Later Hungarian list at the club today and ground down an Early Republican Roman Army. His next trick is to try not to throw lots of ones for death rolls.
Edit: Make that Late Republican.
Edit: Make that Late Republican.
- Tue Oct 15, 2013 5:06 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Flank charging a kinked column
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5932
Re: Flank charging a kinked column
I'm running Conquest down here in NZ in a couple of weeks and I've been asked how I would rule if this came up so this is my answer on the local wargaming forum: Normally my ruling on something like this would be determined by the quality of the alcohol bought for me. However for medical reasons I'm...
- Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:56 am
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: Figure preparation HELL
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4739
Re: Figure preparation HELL
i find that using a thinned down enamel based paint works best. It bonds with the metal and the acrylic paints cover easily.
- Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:57 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Field of Glory 2.0 - coming October 18th!
- Replies: 126
- Views: 31574
Re: Field of Glory 2.0 - coming October 18th!
Can we pre-order the hardback version?
- Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:29 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
- Replies: 383
- Views: 66483
Re: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
How about issuing update sheet(s) for owners of hard-copy V1, but still make all future "full" editions ipad/tablet/kindle only - and include some groovy enhanced features that the ipad can support? Like, imagine if the army lists were on ipad/pc, but included a drag-and-drop army list bu...
- Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:24 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
- Replies: 383
- Views: 66483
Re: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
Big discussion amongst local gamers as to what is meant by "Leapfrogging"Interpenetration anomalies prevented:
Leapfrogging prevented.
“Teleport” interpenetrations prevented.
Is it normal interpenetration ie. LF through HF or something else.
- Sat Jul 14, 2012 1:55 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
- Replies: 383
- Views: 66483
Re: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
6) The plight of those who don't have e-readers / tablets is real. A good suggestion is a pdf file with just v2.0 amendments that can be purchased and printed since v2.0 isn't that different from v1.0. One advantage is that it retains some of the value of unsold books that are still in stores. It's...
- Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:55 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
- Replies: 383
- Views: 66483
Re: Field of Glory goes 2.0 !
Ok so I have a PC at home but wargame at the club so unless someone there has an Ipod or laptop I'm not going to have access to the rules when I need them. As much as I enjoy playing FOG, I'm not prepared to spend money I don't have buying something I don't really need so that I can use it once or t...
- Sat Nov 05, 2011 1:19 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Warring States
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1875
- Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:52 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Small is Beautiful
- Replies: 57
- Views: 11629
We have just completed a 650 pt tournament on 3 x 5 tables with normal terrain rules and deployment options. We played 2.5 hour games. The majority of the games played were completed within the allotted time with a clear result, 2 games timed out with a draw and 1 game was called by the players conc...
- Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:50 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Impact foot charging
- Replies: 3
- Views: 994
Impact foot charging
in a game today my opponent charged a couple of BGs into my defensive spear. in the movement phase he advanced a BG of undrilled HF impact foot/swordsmen into an overlap position. This brouht them into charge range of another BG of Defensive spear. In his next bound was he required to test not to ch...
- Wed Jun 15, 2011 8:16 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: anti Benny-Hill measures
- Replies: 22
- Views: 3931
I think you need to consider the implications before suggesting a rule. It would reduce the number of draws as if its going to be a draw you just point out to your opponent that if one will concede it is 10pts better for one side and 5 pt better for the other than a draw. As it got near the end of ...
- Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:45 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: anti Benny-Hill measures
- Replies: 22
- Views: 3931
- Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:52 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: charging from behind PO's
- Replies: 41
- Views: 4727
- Sun May 29, 2011 9:54 am
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: Garagecon - Nelson, New Zealand - July 23/24 - 800pts
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2917
- Sun May 29, 2011 9:51 am
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: Garagecon - Nelson, New Zealand - July 23/24 - 800pts
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2917