TDC - Archive

[frederic02]

Div B

frederic02 Byzantine 988-1041 won against Vadim84 Arab conquest 638-684. 63-57

Très belle bataille acharnée qui a vu une courte victoire des Byzantins dans le dernier tour de jeu mais les Arabes auraient pu aussi l'emporter. Bravo à Vadim pour le combat livré

[Armchairbaron]

DIV C

Armchairbaron Polish 1455-1500AD with Lithuanian 1445-1500AD allies

defeats

gort7078 Ottoman Turks 1430-1500


Score: 50-19

Thank you for the game.

[ulysisgrunt]

ulysisgrunt (Lysimachids) defeated SawyerK(Romans) 52-27

[ericdoman1]

Div A

ericdoman1 Lombard 570-649AD w Avar 558-631AD allies

defeated

frederic02 Hephthalite 350-570AD w Sassanid 350-476AD allies

42 - 16. If Frederic had had another turn, the score would have been about 42 -32 and then the game would have lasted a long time.

[ericdoman1]

Division A

ericdoman1 Danish 1450-1487AD w German (Feudal) 1450-1489AD allies

defeated

random27 Indian (Muslim) 1470-1500AD

61 - 36. Another tough encounter versus Francois

[SawyerK]

Division C

SawyerK with the Roman 105-25 BC army and Bithynian ally

challenges

hscic leading the Roman 219-200 BC army and Pergamene ally.

Password is 'Roman' and personal message sent.

[alexmike1]

Division C

alexmike1 Aragonese 1200-1274AD with Castilian/Leonese allies challenges mcfcivo Seljuq Turk (West) 1037-1154

pm sent

[mberisso]

Challenges sent for:

Armchairbaron
mh5064
Dragmio

PM sent

[xxCLASHxx]

Div C

xxCLASHxx Indian 320-545AD was victorious - against mcfcivo Palmyran 258-273AD w Armenian 253-476AD allies

55 - 28 = 92 -28

Indians struggled to get to grips with the Palmyrans and their Roman infantry ran amok in the centre and destroyed the Indian army with ease, on the flanks the Indian Noble Lancers and eles managed to route the Cataphracts and leave both flanks exposed. It was a series of hard melees that saw both flanks of Palmyrans break and enabled the Indian horse to pick off the massed archers. Palmyrans were still solid in the middle and looked formidable but the Indians were too mobile and were able to route the remnants of the flanks.

Thank you mcfcivo for a great battle that swung each way.

[anderarcos11]

anderarcos11 Galatian 280-63 BC beat hscic Roman 219 BC - 200 BC with Pergamene 262 BC - 191 BC allies, 49 to 23. Score is 83 to 23

[xxCLASHxx]

Hi there, this is my first tournament and have come up against a couple of things I don't understand, the main one is that in one battle very well played by vakarr my army gave up with just 40% losses yet I usually have had to get up to 60% or near before my opponent gave up, is there some logic to this please?

Thanks

[vakarr]

Hi there, this is my first tournament and have come up against a couple of things I don't understand, the main one is that in one battle very well played by vakarr my army gave up with just 40% losses yet I usually have had to get up to 60% or near before my opponent gave up, is there some logic to this please?

Thanks

If the winning army has less than 25% losses, the opponent only has to get 40% losses to lose. Once both armies are over 25% losses, they have to get to 60% to lose.

[Bagatrix1805]

Div D
Bagatrix1805 defeated Indibil 64-37 both armies are beat up, just a good old fashioned slug fest well played to indibil and good luck the rest of the way

[vakarr]

Div C

Victory for Vakarr Thracian (Roman Client) 50BC-46AD+Roman 24BC-196AD ally vs xxCLASHXX Indian 320-545AD 41- 8

The Thracians survived the arrow storm and smashed the Indian centre. The flanks were a hard struggle but not enough in the end. The upgrade for the rhomphia men plus the ability of the Romans to stand up to elephants made the difference. Very hard for the Indians to win against my army. There wasn't any terrain that made any difference

[random27]

here are the results for now

[Najanaja]

Div B
Najanaja kyrenean Greek 630 + Libyan beat Rob123 Armenian (Tigranes) with Pontic 84-47BC allies
60-46

[Najanaja]

Div B
Najanaja kyrenean Greek 630 + Libyan beat IMC Gallic 300-101BC with Samnite 355-272 BC Allies
61-39

[markleslie]

Division A

markleslie Roman 425-492 AD + Germanic Foot Tribes 260-599 AD.

challenges

frederic02 Hephthalite 350-570 AD + Sassanid 350-476 AD.

PM and password sent.

[xxCLASHxx]

Hi there, this is my first tournament and have come up against a couple of things I don't understand, the main one is that in one battle very well played by vakarr my army gave up with just 40% losses yet I usually have had to get up to 60% or near before my opponent gave up, is there some logic to this please?

Thanks

If the winning army has less than 25% losses, the opponent only has to get 40% losses to lose. Once both armies are over 25% losses, they have to get to 60% to lose.

Thank you Vakarr for explaining that and well done on a comprehensive win, I felt I had some points to get on your left as it was finally breaking down, it would not of changed the result but another 10 or 15 points would of been a good result after that mass route. Well played.

[ericdoman1]

Hi there, this is my first tournament and have come up against a couple of things I don't understand, the main one is that in one battle very well played by vakarr my army gave up with just 40% losses yet I usually have had to get up to 60% or near before my opponent gave up, is there some logic to this please?

Thanks

If the winning army has less than 25% losses, the opponent only has to get 40% losses to lose. Once both armies are over 25% losses, they have to get to 60% to lose.

Hi xxCLASHxx

Look at the score, top left and below that is your objective. You may need to click on the triangle top left to see this