TDC - Archive
Moderators: kronenblatt, ericdoman1, Geffalrus, carpenkm, harveylh, Karvon, Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
-
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:14 pm
Re: TDC IV BRONZE AND IRON AGE 2500BC TO 701BC - Results
Division A
Stones1985 (Urartian with Cimmerian Allies) beat anderarcos11 (Assyrian with Neo Hittite/Aramean Allies) by a score of 43 to 8.
Thanks for the game.
Stones1985 (Urartian with Cimmerian Allies) beat anderarcos11 (Assyrian with Neo Hittite/Aramean Allies) by a score of 43 to 8.
Thanks for the game.
-
- 2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:54 pm
Re: TDC IV BRONZE AND IRON AGE 2500BC TO 701BC - Results
I think that in my scores the error and anomaly that has meant placing me in the first division is clear.
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:35 pm
Re: TDC 4 Dark Ages - Results Thread
Division A
BobGanoush(Anglo-Saxon) defeats Zawzgrzyt(Frankish with Breton allies) 60-46
BobGanoush(Anglo-Saxon) defeats Zawzgrzyt(Frankish with Breton allies) 60-46
Re: TDC IV BRONZE AND IRON AGE 2500BC TO 701BC - Results
For Division D , dragmio will replace Agirlushouldknow , i am waiting for his army choice
Anderarcos , i agree with you , this is the little problem with ELO , being myself in division D was weird
, next season we will be each of us in division that fit more our level
Anderarcos , i agree with you , this is the little problem with ELO , being myself in division D was weird

Re: TDC IV BRONZE AND IRON AGE 2500BC TO 701BC - Challenges
Division C
Alexmike1 Egyptian 1200-1150BC challenges Rob123 Babylonian 890-729BC with Arab 1000-313BC allies.
PM sent
Alexmike1 Egyptian 1200-1150BC challenges Rob123 Babylonian 890-729BC with Arab 1000-313BC allies.
PM sent
Re: TDC IV BRONZE AND IRON AGE 2500BC TO 701BC - Results
For DIV D
Nonovitch (assyrian) defeated Plhewis (egyptian) 94 - 9 (Final score)
Nonovitch (assyrian) defeated Plhewis (egyptian) 94 - 9 (Final score)
Last edited by nonovitch on Mon Jul 10, 2023 9:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

-
- Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2021 5:17 pm
- Location: Lancashire in the UK
Re: TDC IV Early Medieval Challenges
DIV C
Armchairbaron Polish with Hungarian allies (1200-1319)
challenges
dragmio Aragonese 1275-1319 1275-1319
pw is Aragonese
Armchairbaron Polish with Hungarian allies (1200-1319)
challenges
dragmio Aragonese 1275-1319 1275-1319
pw is Aragonese
Re: TDC IV BRONZE AND IRON AGE 2500BC TO 701BC - Results
nonovitch c'est le score de base final ???
Re: TDC IV Imperial 25BC - 600AD Results
Div C
xxCLASHxx Indian 320-545AD was victorious verses DirtyMark Roman 285-312AD w Frankish 260-495AD allies
score 57 - 49 = 65 - 49
Thank you to Mark for a very close game.
The Romans were very strong but the phalanxes were deadly and Indian infantry were scattered far and wide, it looked as though the Romans would be victorious but the flanks were exposed and the archers did good work. It remained a seesaw battle but the eles and cav were mobile enough to turn the battle towards the Indians on the flanks and the phalanxes were just too slow to catch them. DirtyMark used phalanx squares to really good effect and this kept his phalanx units in good order when they were isolated pretty much went down to the last turn.
xxCLASHxx Indian 320-545AD was victorious verses DirtyMark Roman 285-312AD w Frankish 260-495AD allies
score 57 - 49 = 65 - 49
Thank you to Mark for a very close game.
The Romans were very strong but the phalanxes were deadly and Indian infantry were scattered far and wide, it looked as though the Romans would be victorious but the flanks were exposed and the archers did good work. It remained a seesaw battle but the eles and cav were mobile enough to turn the battle towards the Indians on the flanks and the phalanxes were just too slow to catch them. DirtyMark used phalanx squares to really good effect and this kept his phalanx units in good order when they were isolated pretty much went down to the last turn.
-
- Senior Corporal - Destroyer
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:24 am
Re: TDC IV Classical Results
Div D
principes romanes (Roman 199 BC with Numidian allies) defeats Linko (Indo Greek with Indian allies) 44-6
The romans braved a storm of arrows to secure the hill overlooking the battle.
Thanks for the game.
principes romanes (Roman 199 BC with Numidian allies) defeats Linko (Indo Greek with Indian allies) 44-6
The romans braved a storm of arrows to secure the hill overlooking the battle.
Thanks for the game.
-
- General - King Tiger
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:43 pm
- Location: Wales
Re: TDC IV Imperial 25BC - 600AD Results
Hi BothxxCLASHxx wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2023 9:51 pm Div C
xxCLASHxx Indian 320-545AD was victorious verses DirtyMark Roman 285-312AD w Frankish 260-495AD allies
score 57 - 49 = 65 - 49
Thank you to Mark for a very close game.
The Romans were very strong but the phalanxes were deadly and Indian infantry were scattered far and wide, it looked as though the Romans would be victorious but the flanks were exposed and the archers did good work. It remained a seesaw battle but the eles and cav were mobile enough to turn the battle towards the Indians on the flanks and the phalanxes were just too slow to catch them. DirtyMark used phalanx squares to really good effect and this kept his phalanx units in good order when they were isolated pretty much went down to the last turn.
The final score is 57 - 49
-
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:14 pm
Re: TDC IV Late Medieval 1320-1500AD - Results
Division A
Stones1985 (Indian Viyanagara) beat TaiBa (Hussite(Utraquist) by a score of 61 to 57.
A very tight game indeed between two vastly different armies. It swung back and forth and the Indians just sneaked it at the end.
Thanks for the game.
Stones1985 (Indian Viyanagara) beat TaiBa (Hussite(Utraquist) by a score of 61 to 57.
A very tight game indeed between two vastly different armies. It swung back and forth and the Indians just sneaked it at the end.
Thanks for the game.
-
- Senior Corporal - Destroyer
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:24 am
Re: TDC IV Classical 700 BC – 25 BC Challenges
Division D
principes romanes (Romans 199 + Numidian allies) challenges rockmanbob123 (Hannibal 216 in Italy + Bruttian allies)
PM sent
What happens if Hannibal had to fight the later Roman army that had already found some Numidian allies?
principes romanes (Romans 199 + Numidian allies) challenges rockmanbob123 (Hannibal 216 in Italy + Bruttian allies)
PM sent
What happens if Hannibal had to fight the later Roman army that had already found some Numidian allies?
Re: TDC IV BRONZE AND IRON AGE 2500BC TO 701BC - Results
Div B
oscarius (Sea Peoples) defeats BobGanoush (Phoenician): 63 - 39
The terrain in this match proved a mixed bag for both sides. On the one hand my foe had the advantage of modest elevation across a lot of his line but on the other a large stream at the bottom of these slopes made it difficult for my foe to put his heavy chariots to best use. In general owing to the large unit sizes of my list and their impact foot/swordsmen status I had better infantry blocks but my foe had more to spread around.
I brought a fairly shooty line-up (for such a sledgehammer style army list) to try provoke Bob off the hills. After eating a lot of my javelins (I think I inflicted about 1000 casualties before we'd even had our first melee), he did break off some reserves to cross the river and outflank my left, an effort I was lucky to hold back (the old hide a mob in the forest trick came in handy) and defeat.
In the centre the terrain was relatively flat so I decided to concentrate my initial assault here. My frightening warriors performed well against the already worn down Phoenician foot and the river again prevented his chariots (and his sole heavy foot guard unit) from contributing as much as they could have. My foe had the most success on his right where he was starting to make some serious headway with his own assault but by then the points had concluded in my favour.
A difficult game where both sides spent a long time carefully jostling for position and advantage. Well-played!
oscarius (Sea Peoples) defeats BobGanoush (Phoenician): 63 - 39
The terrain in this match proved a mixed bag for both sides. On the one hand my foe had the advantage of modest elevation across a lot of his line but on the other a large stream at the bottom of these slopes made it difficult for my foe to put his heavy chariots to best use. In general owing to the large unit sizes of my list and their impact foot/swordsmen status I had better infantry blocks but my foe had more to spread around.
I brought a fairly shooty line-up (for such a sledgehammer style army list) to try provoke Bob off the hills. After eating a lot of my javelins (I think I inflicted about 1000 casualties before we'd even had our first melee), he did break off some reserves to cross the river and outflank my left, an effort I was lucky to hold back (the old hide a mob in the forest trick came in handy) and defeat.
In the centre the terrain was relatively flat so I decided to concentrate my initial assault here. My frightening warriors performed well against the already worn down Phoenician foot and the river again prevented his chariots (and his sole heavy foot guard unit) from contributing as much as they could have. My foe had the most success on his right where he was starting to make some serious headway with his own assault but by then the points had concluded in my favour.
A difficult game where both sides spent a long time carefully jostling for position and advantage. Well-played!
Re: TDC IV - Imperial 25BC-600AD Challenge Thread
Your army is a difficult combination to control but refusing your centre and attacking on the flanks seems the right way to go. The problem is that elephants are slow moving, so it takes time to get around the flanks. Your archers always have a minus to their morale for having bows and the elephants have a 2 square wide morale check circle when they rout - a combination that makes the army quite brittle. Not sure how many you are allowed, but you need to maximise and concentrate the close fighters. I think you are allowed an artillery unit, and should use it if possible - not for the few casualties that it will cause but for the "shot at by artillery" -1 morale effect. A unit shot at by artillery then charged by an elephant is more likely to fail its test for the charge. Same goes for a unit shot at by the bowmen then by artillery.xxCLASHxx wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2023 12:35 pm
Thank you Vakarr for explaining that and well done on a comprehensive win, I felt I had some points to get on your left as it was finally breaking down, it would not of changed the result but another 10 or 15 points would of been a good result after that mass route. Well played.
-
- Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:16 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: TDC 4 Dark Ages - Challenge Thread
Div. A
Rob123Viking (Ireland) 900-1049AD with Scots 851-1051AD allies challenges Triarii Armenian 885-1045AD with Byzantine 963-987 allies
PW Scots PM sent
Rob123Viking (Ireland) 900-1049AD with Scots 851-1051AD allies challenges Triarii Armenian 885-1045AD with Byzantine 963-987 allies
PW Scots PM sent
Re: TDC 4 Dark Ages - Challenge Thread
Division C
Challenge created for gfs26
Rus w/Vikings vs French w/Vikings
PW qwerty
PM also sent
Have fun
Challenge created for gfs26
Rus w/Vikings vs French w/Vikings
PW qwerty
PM also sent
Have fun
Re: TDC IV BRONZE AND IRON AGE 2500BC TO 701BC - Results
Div A
tyronec (Hittite) defeats anderarcos11 (Assyrian) 50-4
Thanks for the game.
tyronec (Hittite) defeats anderarcos11 (Assyrian) 50-4
Thanks for the game.
Re: TDC IV Imperial 25BC - 600AD Results
Div A
tyronec (Indo-Greek) defeats Rob123 (Roman) 55-12
Thanks for the game.
tyronec (Indo-Greek) defeats Rob123 (Roman) 55-12
Thanks for the game.