Empires of the Dragon
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:23 pm
- Location: Portland, Oregon US
-
- Field of Glory 2
- Posts: 28261
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
-
- 2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:55 pm
CACS distinctive?
Are the Central Asian City States distinctive? Ive got some arab Ghulam figs for abotu half an army and a few CACS cavalry from outpost and wondering which way to go? Or are they pretty much along the lines of the other Timurid/Ghaznavid/Seljuk lists with drilled superior Cav w Bow & SW accompanied by a swag of Bow armed LH.
Any other distinctive oddball combinations not seen much to date (in the same way as heavy weapon MF armed with Bow* in the americas book)
Anthony
Any other distinctive oddball combinations not seen much to date (in the same way as heavy weapon MF armed with Bow* in the americas book)
Anthony
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:23 pm
- Location: Portland, Oregon US
-
- Field of Glory 2
- Posts: 28261
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: CACS distinctive?
The heavy cavalry can either be all Lancers, Swordsmen or all Bow, Swordsmenexpendablecinc wrote:Are the Central Asian City States distinctive? Ive got some arab Ghulam figs for abotu half an army and a few CACS cavalry from outpost and wondering which way to go? Or are they pretty much along the lines of the other Timurid/Ghaznavid/Seljuk lists with drilled superior Cav w Bow & SW accompanied by a swag of Bow armed LH.
Yes. In the Japanese lists - there are threads on those somewhere here.Any other distinctive oddball combinations not seen much to date (in the same way as heavy weapon MF armed with Bow* in the americas book)
-
- Field of Glory 2
- Posts: 28261
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:23 pm
- Location: Portland, Oregon US
Now that my prying, repairing and gluing of spearmen and halberdiers is well underway, I have one more question: are there any Han two-handed swordsmen, and if so are they also MF?
This is the first army I painted, vintage 1982 Mikes Models
& Asgard--more of a fantasy Han army these days. Which makes me wonder, once the Terra Cotta army came to light, did all the armor with rings sewn on disappear, or was it mythical to begin with?
This is the first army I painted, vintage 1982 Mikes Models

-
- Field of Glory 2
- Posts: 28261
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Well there are MF swordsmen, graded as...swordsmen, but I guess those are the ones depicted with single-handed sword and parrying weapon. Two-handed swordsmen would be HW, which would grade them the same as the normal "halberdiers" with ji. I am not sure how good the evidence is for two-handed swordsmen in this period - but there are plenty in the later Chinese lists.MarkSieber wrote:Now that my prying, repairing and gluing of spearmen and halberdiers is well underway, I have one more question: are there any Han two-handed swordsmen, and if so are they also MF?
It was a 'unique' interpretation of what evidence was available.MarkSieber wrote:Now that my prying, repairing and gluing of spearmen and halberdiers is well underway, I have one more question: are there any Han two-handed swordsmen, and if so are they also MF?
This is the first army I painted, vintage 1982 Mikes Models& Asgard--more of a fantasy Han army these days. Which makes me wonder, once the Terra Cotta army came to light, did all the armor with rings sewn on disappear, or was it mythical to begin with?

-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:23 pm
- Location: Portland, Oregon US
The frescos and brick relief's in Han tombs tend to show warriors in dress robes and hats rather than in armour and helmet. Geer knew from his reading that they wore armour and appears to have assumed that the robes were armoured. The rings apparently are an interpretation of the decorations on the silk robes.MarkSieber wrote:Are there sources disputing it, or explaining what that evidence actually represented?It was a 'unique' interpretation of what evidence was available.![]()
Han armour is illustrated in most books covering the army. Early Han were virtually identical to late chin (terracotta warriors). Later they used modified versions of lamella armour both leather and iron.
A quick Google on Han Chinese armour will give you loads of leads eg http://forums.swordforum.com/showthread.php?t=77511
-
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:01 pm
- Location: Wheaton - Suburb of Chicago
-
- Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:33 am
- Location: Bara?±ain Navarra Spain
If somebody is looking for inspiration to paint a Han army there is a good source:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDqamjm8 ... re=related
Chinese do the things BIG.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDqamjm8 ... re=related
Chinese do the things BIG.
-
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 6:02 pm
- Location: Lost Angeles
-
- Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
- Posts: 1966
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am
I remember once having to do an assignment for Biology class. They made us draw a picture of an animal that was described to us in written format. It was one of those 'this is what Darwin wrote about an animal, draw what he's describing'.tadamson wrote:It was a 'unique' interpretation of what evidence was available.
The animals we drew were so widely variable it was amazing.
Then the teacher showed us a picture of the actual animal.
Nobody got close.
-
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 6:02 pm
- Location: Lost Angeles