LT DAG Lists Errors

[keithmartinsmith]

Both of the Kushan lists have "Swordsmem".

Fixed as part of the next update 1.4.8.

Keith

[ianiow]

Gepids

The camp should be 0-1 (currently 1-1)

Thuringian allies - nobles are HF but have a cavalry graphic.

[ianiow]

Picts

Saxon allies - nobles are HF but the graphic is cavalry

[keithmartinsmith]

Gepids

The camp should be 0-1 (currently 1-1)

Thuringian allies - nobles are HF but have a cavalry graphic.

Thanks and fixed as part of the 1.4.8 update. Keith

[keithmartinsmith]

Fixed as part of the 1.4.8 update. Thanks Keith

[ianiow]

Anciet British

Roman allies Legionaries should be 0-6 (currently 2-6)

there is a special note in the TT army list that states that roman allies for the British list "need not include any legionaries". (bottom of page 30)

[donkiesrus2003]

Dacian List
DAG has captured bolt shooters as drilled, FOG printed army lists have them as Undrilled

Later Sarmatian List
DAG has foot archers as 0-4, FOG printed army lists have them as 0-12 which translates as 0-6

Sarmatian Allies
DAG gives this list scouts Light Horse , FOG printed army lists have foot archers instead.

[/b]

[donkiesrus2003]

DAG has Falxmen as protected, printed FOG Army list has them as unprotected.

[davouthojo]

DAG
LT Early Scots-Irish Slingers quantity 0-0
ROR Numidian (Juba II) Can’t change generals, so can’t get allies either

Not a DAG issue, but in detailed combt results display,
Estimated hits - Listed in exponential format E(5.0e-1)

[Scutarii]

Dominate Roman (western late) 389-425 AD

Legionaries with no bows (non M units) have in the image an archer

Equites, when you select one as commander you are forced to take one poor equites... can send commander to superior??? or at least to the equites that you select.

[keithmartinsmith]

Anciet British

Roman allies Legionaries should be 0-6 (currently 2-6)

there is a special note in the TT army list that states that roman allies for the British list "need not include any legionaries". (bottom of page 30)

>> Fixed as part of the next update. Thanks Keith

[davouthojo]

Palmyran Army list

Roman Legionary Lanceri should be Armoured not Unarmoured

Dacian Army list

Should the Falxmen be Protected or Unarmoured?

[batesmotel]

Fortified camp should be 0-1, not 1-1.

Chris

[keithmartinsmith]

Dacian List
DAG has captured bolt shooters as drilled, FOG printed army lists have them as Undrilled
>> Fixed ready for the 1.4.8 update.

Later Sarmatian List
DAG has foot archers as 0-4, FOG printed army lists have them as 0-12 which translates as 0-6
>> Fixed ready for the 1.4.8 update.

Sarmatian Allies
DAG gives this list scouts Light Horse , FOG printed army lists have foot archers instead.
>> Fixed ready for the 1.4.8 update.

>> Thanks Keith

[keithmartinsmith]

DAG has Falxmen as protected, printed FOG Army list has them as unprotected.

>> Fixed for 1.4.8 and have improved all the Dacian MF infantry images. Keith

[keithmartinsmith]

DAG
LT Early Scots-Irish Slingers quantity 0-0
ROR Numidian (Juba II) Can’t change generals, so can’t get allies either

>>> Fixed ready for the 1.4.8 update. Thanks Keith

[keithmartinsmith]

Dominate Roman (western late) 389-425 AD

Legionaries with no bows (non M units) have in the image an archer

Equites, when you select one as commander you are forced to take one poor equites... can send commander to superior??? or at least to the equites that you select.

>> Fixed as part of the next update 1.4.8. Thanks Keith

[keithmartinsmith]

Fortified camp should be 0-1, not 1-1.

Chris

>>> This issue has been fixed ready for the 1.4.8 update for a number of the LTR lists. Thanks Keith

[keithmartinsmith]

Palmyran Army list

Roman Legionary Lanceri should be Armoured not Unarmoured
>> Fixed ready for the 1.4.8 update.


Dacian Army list

Should the Falxmen be Protected or Unarmoured?
>> Fixed and with a new images ready for the 1.4.8 update.


>>> Thanks Keith

[batesmotel]

Principate Roman (early) - MF Symmachiarii have a HF image.

Chris