From my understanding, yes the DLCs, at least the first one, will be accompanied with updates. For example, tt's possible that the devs will have to create new units in some of the campaigns. These units will be available for everyone through updates.Molve wrote:If that was a reply to El Condoro, I think his question was moreiainmcneil wrote:Yes we will need a patch to add the ability to play DLC to the game.
"will the DLCs be accompanied by general upgrades"
and not so much
"how will the DLCs be supported by the program?"
Extra Content for Panzer Corps Announced!
Moderators: Slitherine Core, Panzer Corps Moderators, Panzer Corps Design
-
- Major-General - Tiger I
- Posts: 2312
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:56 pm
- Location: Northeast, USA
I personally do want to – but if someone doesn’t want to get the DLC; then how will the “update” part be available for everyone? Will that part of it be offered through a patch on its own?VPaulus wrote:From my understanding, yes the DLCs, at least the first one, will be accompanied with updates. For example, tt's possible that the devs will have to create new units in some of the campaigns. These units will be available for everyone through updates.Molve wrote:If that was a reply to El Condoro, I think his question was moreiainmcneil wrote:Yes we will need a patch to add the ability to play DLC to the game.
"will the DLCs be accompanied by general upgrades"
and not so much
"how will the DLCs be supported by the program?"
-
- Panzer Corps Moderator
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:32 am
Lots of quotes within quotes...Xerkis wrote:I personally do want to – but if someone doesn’t want to get the DLC; then how will the “update” part be available for everyone? Will that part of it be offered through a patch on its own?VPaulus wrote:From my understanding, yes the DLCs, at least the first one, will be accompanied with updates. For example, tt's possible that the devs will have to create new units in some of the campaigns. These units will be available for everyone through updates.Molve wrote: If that was a reply to El Condoro, I think his question was more
"will the DLCs be accompanied by general upgrades"
and not so much
"how will the DLCs be supported by the program?"
Iain's answer is what I was getting at with my question. To me the word 'needs' implies the DLC will not function without a patch. The patch is free, so everyone can have that - they will choose whether or not to spend the $4.99 for each campaign on top of that.
-
- 1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 3:17 pm
- Location: Canada
So many ideas, so many options to work with. In the end, it isn't my property of course 
I personally think Steam could work. I've had the evidence dumped in my lap. It's never easy to argue a losing viewpoint in the face of proof.
DLC also clearly works. I've also seen it crammed in my face as well as proof the idea works.
But in a crowd of say 10000 clients, the idea all 10k clients will like something is just plain crazy of course.
Soooo if Slitherine makes as much money as Slitherine desires, in the end, as long as THEY made the level of success THEY desired.
Some things though just have no numbers to work with, and a lot of us spout off opinions pretending to be facts.
I personally couldn't care less how many of the wargaming world are self evident cheap skates. I'm not one of them. Which is not to say I am not capable of being a cheap skate elsewhere in gaming. Just not in wargaming. And no, it's not out of some undying love of the hobby, or some peculiar love of a company. Ian has gained my respect, he's profiting from it too. There ARE wargame makers that most assuredly don't have my respect.
I hear that Matrix Games never puts their prices down meaningfully. You should try HPS, they never reduce their prices ever at all. In fact, if you like that company's games, you should be buying them from NWS instead. Often a difference of 15 bucks on anything even new.
But it's not correct to say Matrix Games never has sales. And their sales are often fairly good too. For those die hard cheap skates, you can always wait till Christmas, they usually have some good deals. Just don't expect 50 dollar games for 10 bucks.
Not all of the industry makes transitory play only once titles.
A lot of the console games out there go for 50 bucks to 70 bucks new, and have no replay value and are likely only good for a month.
Most of my wargames from Matrix Games/Slitherine will still be as good as they were the day I bought them, endlessly replayable, and not really losing any original dollar value. So people just need to accept it, not all games lose value in a month. You either like the game and it's what it cost the day it was released, or move along and get over it.
But I am sure Steam could move more copies all the same, even for a lower price, but that's just the dynamics of volume.
I don't advocate spoiling the cheap in society though. Maybe people have just gotten cheap at heart.
I don't support Steam because it is a cheaper option, I support Steam because it's a more VISIBLE option.
It has nothing to do with re downloadability as much so either.
And I too have watched almost every name in quality wargaming disappear.
And not just computer wargaming. Wargaming in general has had a rough life since 1970. Not sure there was really ever a 'golden age' at all. Likely foolish rose coloured glasses.
Avalon Hill is gone. So is SPI. Can't think of any meaningful names actually that made it out of the 80s.
ASL has been on a sort of life support since the 90s. More like the living dead as a game.
So I welcome DLC. I welcome anything Slitherine can make work. But we all know, most games live for about 3 years regardless. Because by then all the hardware has evolved, all the OS programs change. I can barely play a lot of my classic game, not because they stopped beuing great, but because we stopped being able to run them in the conditions they were sold in.
I figure Panzer Corps will have run it's duration as a product in 2 years maybe more. So I can just hope we get as much DLC as we can, as soon as possible, before the usual process catches up to it.
I'm already dropping hints for Slitherine to recreate Panzer leader now

I personally think Steam could work. I've had the evidence dumped in my lap. It's never easy to argue a losing viewpoint in the face of proof.
DLC also clearly works. I've also seen it crammed in my face as well as proof the idea works.
But in a crowd of say 10000 clients, the idea all 10k clients will like something is just plain crazy of course.
Soooo if Slitherine makes as much money as Slitherine desires, in the end, as long as THEY made the level of success THEY desired.
Some things though just have no numbers to work with, and a lot of us spout off opinions pretending to be facts.
I personally couldn't care less how many of the wargaming world are self evident cheap skates. I'm not one of them. Which is not to say I am not capable of being a cheap skate elsewhere in gaming. Just not in wargaming. And no, it's not out of some undying love of the hobby, or some peculiar love of a company. Ian has gained my respect, he's profiting from it too. There ARE wargame makers that most assuredly don't have my respect.
I hear that Matrix Games never puts their prices down meaningfully. You should try HPS, they never reduce their prices ever at all. In fact, if you like that company's games, you should be buying them from NWS instead. Often a difference of 15 bucks on anything even new.
But it's not correct to say Matrix Games never has sales. And their sales are often fairly good too. For those die hard cheap skates, you can always wait till Christmas, they usually have some good deals. Just don't expect 50 dollar games for 10 bucks.
Not all of the industry makes transitory play only once titles.
A lot of the console games out there go for 50 bucks to 70 bucks new, and have no replay value and are likely only good for a month.
Most of my wargames from Matrix Games/Slitherine will still be as good as they were the day I bought them, endlessly replayable, and not really losing any original dollar value. So people just need to accept it, not all games lose value in a month. You either like the game and it's what it cost the day it was released, or move along and get over it.
But I am sure Steam could move more copies all the same, even for a lower price, but that's just the dynamics of volume.
I don't advocate spoiling the cheap in society though. Maybe people have just gotten cheap at heart.
I don't support Steam because it is a cheaper option, I support Steam because it's a more VISIBLE option.
It has nothing to do with re downloadability as much so either.
And I too have watched almost every name in quality wargaming disappear.
And not just computer wargaming. Wargaming in general has had a rough life since 1970. Not sure there was really ever a 'golden age' at all. Likely foolish rose coloured glasses.
Avalon Hill is gone. So is SPI. Can't think of any meaningful names actually that made it out of the 80s.
ASL has been on a sort of life support since the 90s. More like the living dead as a game.
So I welcome DLC. I welcome anything Slitherine can make work. But we all know, most games live for about 3 years regardless. Because by then all the hardware has evolved, all the OS programs change. I can barely play a lot of my classic game, not because they stopped beuing great, but because we stopped being able to run them in the conditions they were sold in.
I figure Panzer Corps will have run it's duration as a product in 2 years maybe more. So I can just hope we get as much DLC as we can, as soon as possible, before the usual process catches up to it.
I'm already dropping hints for Slitherine to recreate Panzer leader now

-
- Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:13 am
- Location: Indonesia
- Contact:
I agree with you, many wargaming company lost, perhaps it's because the true wargame is out there ( some place have real war everyday ). IMHO we should donate every purchase of wargaming industry to war casualties, they're the true inspiration after all. War never ends. War gaming prevents all of us to do the war ourselfDSWargamer wrote: ...
I figure Panzer Corps will have run it's duration as a product in 2 years maybe more. So I can just hope we get as much DLC as we can, as soon as possible, before the usual process catches up to it.
I'm already dropping hints for Slitherine to recreate Panzer leader now

My idea for next Panzer Leader


I just wanted to avise to dropt that information to gaming sides too.
I , for instance, read of Panzer Corps at www.4players.de and bought it straight away from release. Dropping a hint about the patch, the dlc (and maybe even the very well produced modding tools) would attain interest and show, that this game is further sustained by the devs. Often this information is not found by these sides themselves, so that much information (and publicity) is lost.
Best Regards
Ranta
edit: ah... I just saw, the patch-information made it up to there, nevertheless, information about mod (modkits) and the dlc would be shurely welcome there too
I , for instance, read of Panzer Corps at www.4players.de and bought it straight away from release. Dropping a hint about the patch, the dlc (and maybe even the very well produced modding tools) would attain interest and show, that this game is further sustained by the devs. Often this information is not found by these sides themselves, so that much information (and publicity) is lost.
Best Regards
Ranta
edit: ah... I just saw, the patch-information made it up to there, nevertheless, information about mod (modkits) and the dlc would be shurely welcome there too

-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13558
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 10:19 am
I've no privileged information regarding this. However, I feel that Panzer Corps, is a great game to be ported for MAC and its derivatives. It would be a lost opportunity if not.Molve wrote:Are you sure? After all, any plans for a native OS X application is just talk at this point. It might even never happen *shrug*.
There are no promises regarding this matter, but I'd say that there's a strong possibility that the port will be done in the future. There's a clear intent to do it.
But I too wouldn't be able to wait for it. I'd buy a PC just to be able to play Panzer Corps... now.
I'm sold on the DLCs'. I had always considered Panzer General as too "beer & pretzel" a game for myself. I should remember never to knock something till I've tried it. I took a risk on Panzer Corps and its turned out to be an excellent choice. Single-player campaigns, single-player scenarios, hotseat, multi-player, there's something for everybody. I especially like the gameplay, the progression of units, the unit types to the point where I'm taking screenshots of the entire scenario maps, marking out objectives in white circles, airfields in yellow rectangles, drawing out the rivers in clear blue, crossing points in orange, red lines to denote the individual task force movement.
I would like to make a suggestion and this is not meant to be a criticism. Rivers should be highlighted more prominently in colour (bright blue, for instance) so that the gamer is able to plan his river crossings. As it is now, the river has a very faded look and blends in too much with the background colour. Maybe objectives can be coloured very prominently also, especially airfields as they are very hard to discern from the Strategic Screen. What has especially won me over to Panzer Corps is also the non-invasive copy-protection. No heavy-handed DRM, limited E-licence installs, etc. Sorry for going off-topic.

I would like to make a suggestion and this is not meant to be a criticism. Rivers should be highlighted more prominently in colour (bright blue, for instance) so that the gamer is able to plan his river crossings. As it is now, the river has a very faded look and blends in too much with the background colour. Maybe objectives can be coloured very prominently also, especially airfields as they are very hard to discern from the Strategic Screen. What has especially won me over to Panzer Corps is also the non-invasive copy-protection. No heavy-handed DRM, limited E-licence installs, etc. Sorry for going off-topic.

I have posted a replay here: viewtopic.php?p=264769#264769jaggy wrote:I'm taking screenshots of the entire scenario maps, marking out objectives in white circles, airfields in yellow rectangles, drawing out the rivers in clear blue, crossing points in orange, red lines to denote the individual task force movement.
I would like to make a suggestion and this is not meant to be a criticism. Rivers should be highlighted more prominently in colour (bright blue, for instance) so that the gamer is able to plan his river crossings. As it is now, the river has a very faded look and blends in too much with the background colour. Maybe objectives can be coloured very prominently also, especially airfields as they are very hard to discern from the Strategic Screen.
I agree. I hate games with intrusive copy-protection, where you can trash the game just because the copy-protection driver won't work anymore because of an ServicePack or an new OS (e.g. Win7 64bit). And i simply won't buy games that require online registration/activation, e.g. using Steam. I want to be able to play a game regardless if its already five years old, or if the producing company doesn't exist aynmore.jaggy wrote:What has especially won me over to Panzer Corps is also the non-invasive copy-protection. No heavy-handed DRM, limited E-licence installs, etc. Sorry for going off-topic.
So i really like the way it is handled with PanzerCorps. And the personalized CD is a sort of copy protection.
-
- Panzer Corps Moderator
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:32 am
-
- Panzer Corps Moderator
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:32 am
-
- Corporal - Strongpoint
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 10:48 pm
If everything runs according to the schedule, 39 and 40 will be release next week.
Beta is progressing well.
For the other campaigns of the Grand Campaign, 41 to 45, it's too early to get a release date.
These campaigns will not be linked with Panzer Corps 39-45 main campaign. So after 40 you'll have to wait for 41, in case you want to continue playing after it. Please note, that you don't have to play the 39 campaign in order to play the 40 campaign. You can play them as solo campaigns.
Beta is progressing well.
For the other campaigns of the Grand Campaign, 41 to 45, it's too early to get a release date.
These campaigns will not be linked with Panzer Corps 39-45 main campaign. So after 40 you'll have to wait for 41, in case you want to continue playing after it. Please note, that you don't have to play the 39 campaign in order to play the 40 campaign. You can play them as solo campaigns.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13558
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 10:19 am