Generals and Ambushers
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
Generals and Ambushers
1. P 151 allows players to accompany ambushers with (presumably hidden) generals, provided that this is noted when ambush markers are deployed (towards the start of the set-up sequence).
2. Is it also possible to deploy a general openly with (still hidden) ambushers when other generals are deployed (at the end of the set-up sequence)? Eg when generals are being deployed is it ok to place one openly (obviously he couldn't benefit from concealment at that stage) in the middle of a wood, seemingly away from his troops but (when the ambush markers are revealed) actually in touch with a unit which then emerges? Ie is the clause on p 151 exclusive - does it note the only occasion on which a general cd be placed with ambush troops - or is inclusive: allowing generals to be placed in that way (and so benefiting from not having to be openly positioned), but not preventing them from being deployed in the normal way, but happening to be in contact with troops in ambush.
3. If the deployment described in Q2 is allowed, I guess they would be limited to the normal deployment zone - 15"?
I am particularly interested in Q2. For what it is worth, I cannot see anything in the rules to stop a general being deployed in this way, but a more experienced friend thought it wouldn't be allowed.
With thanks in anticipation,
Alan
2. Is it also possible to deploy a general openly with (still hidden) ambushers when other generals are deployed (at the end of the set-up sequence)? Eg when generals are being deployed is it ok to place one openly (obviously he couldn't benefit from concealment at that stage) in the middle of a wood, seemingly away from his troops but (when the ambush markers are revealed) actually in touch with a unit which then emerges? Ie is the clause on p 151 exclusive - does it note the only occasion on which a general cd be placed with ambush troops - or is inclusive: allowing generals to be placed in that way (and so benefiting from not having to be openly positioned), but not preventing them from being deployed in the normal way, but happening to be in contact with troops in ambush.
3. If the deployment described in Q2 is allowed, I guess they would be limited to the normal deployment zone - 15"?
I am particularly interested in Q2. For what it is worth, I cannot see anything in the rules to stop a general being deployed in this way, but a more experienced friend thought it wouldn't be allowed.
With thanks in anticipation,
Alan
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 437
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:42 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: Generals and Ambushers
I can't see any reason why a general cannot be deployed anywhere within the normal deployment zone. If this means they are with ambushers once they are revealed then fair enough.
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3111
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Fareham, UK
Re: Generals and Ambushers
If the Commander is within the normal deployment zone then there is clearly no problem - he can almost be wherever you like.
If you wish to deploy a Commander outside the normal deployment area, but within the area allowed for ambushers, then personally I don't think this is permitted unless he is concealed in Ambush with a BG.
If you wish to deploy a Commander outside the normal deployment area, but within the area allowed for ambushers, then personally I don't think this is permitted unless he is concealed in Ambush with a BG.
Pete
Re: Generals and Ambushers
Thanks both for your help with this. For what it is worth (because I don't know the rules well) this is what I thought too.
With thanks,
Alan
With thanks,
Alan
-
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
- Posts: 8835
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: Generals and Ambushers
For a general to be with a BG he must be placed in edge to edge and corner to corner with it IIRC so when they appear he will have to move to be with them
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Re: Generals and Ambushers
That's interesting. If that is the way it is played, it is good to know.philqw78 wrote:For a general to be with a BG he must be placed in edge to edge and corner to corner with it IIRC so when they appear he will have to move to be with them
But surely it could be argued that when he was put in the wood he was placed in edge to edge and corner to corner with the BG in ambush? After all, the BG was there all along (it doesn't get air dropped in), but was simply concealed from the other player.
Alan
-
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
- Posts: 8835
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: Generals and Ambushers
Exactly I just gave you one way of reading the rules.
Never seen it played any which way as I've never seen it happen
Never seen it played any which way as I've never seen it happen
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
- Location: Alaska
Re: Generals and Ambushers
I may not be reading your comments correctly. Just to be clear. For a general to be placed with a BG outside the normal deployment area (up to 15 MU for a general), he must be placed when the ambush is placed.acl wrote:That's interesting. If that is the way it is played, it is good to know.philqw78 wrote:For a general to be with a BG he must be placed in edge to edge and corner to corner with it IIRC so when they appear he will have to move to be with them
But surely it could be argued that when he was put in the wood he was placed in edge to edge and corner to corner with the BG in ambush? After all, the BG was there all along (it doesn't get air dropped in), but was simply concealed from the other player.
Alan
Re: Generals and Ambushers
That was question 3 of my original post. I think everyone agrees that a general not deployed in ambush must be within the 15 inches. I think Phil was doubting whether he cd be deployed in proper contact with troops within the 15 inches.bbotus wrote:I may not be reading your comments correctly. Just to be clear. For a general to be placed with a BG outside the normal deployment area (up to 15 MU for a general), he must be placed when the ambush is placed.acl wrote:That's interesting. If that is the way it is played, it is good to know.philqw78 wrote:For a general to be with a BG he must be placed in edge to edge and corner to corner with it IIRC so when they appear he will have to move to be with them
But surely it could be argued that when he was put in the wood he was placed in edge to edge and corner to corner with the BG in ambush? After all, the BG was there all along (it doesn't get air dropped in), but was simply concealed from the other player.
Alan
Alan
-
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
- Location: Alaska
Re: Generals and Ambushers
I don't know why not. Just put the general on the ambush marker. We are allow (required) to move the general out of the way by the minimum possible to make way for BGs. So he would have to end up in contact when deployed.I think Phil was doubting whether he cd be deployed in proper contact with troops within the 15 inches.
-
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
- Posts: 8835
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: Generals and Ambushers
The main thing is, AFAIAC, that if somenone did playing against me I'd be happy. I'd know he didn't have a flank march and the general is being quite useless where he is until the ambush is revealed
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Re: Generals and Ambushers
There's nothing to stop the general moving away in the JAPphilqw78 wrote:The main thing is, AFAIAC, that if somenone did playing against me I'd be happy. I'd know he didn't have a flank march and the general is being quite useless where he is until the ambush is revealed
Evaluator of Supremacy
-
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
- Posts: 8835
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: Generals and Ambushers
And moving in the JAP slowly, as if he is in ambush he will normally be in delaying terrain.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!