Moderator: Slitherine Core
Oh? You mean the Japanese units are already there? I didn't know or think of that!VirgilInTheSKY wrote: ↑Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:44 amPossible. Each carrier actually has a seperated entry for how many aircraft it can hold, so if they want to do something to it, they can. Check Panzer Corps2/Content/Data/Airfields.csv and you should be able to find what I mentioned.
No, I mean the carriers we currently have.adiekmann wrote: ↑Tue Jul 13, 2021 5:53 pmOh? You mean the Japanese units are already there? I didn't know or think of that!VirgilInTheSKY wrote: ↑Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:44 amPossible. Each carrier actually has a seperated entry for how many aircraft it can hold, so if they want to do something to it, they can. Check Panzer Corps2/Content/Data/Airfields.csv and you should be able to find what I mentioned.
Brümmbär was the German's unofficial nickname for it, not the Allies'. But you're right about the King Tiger"/"Königstiger." Those were never used (at least during the war) by the Germans.VirgilInTheSKY wrote: ↑Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:40 amA6M Type 0 is "Zeke", not "Zero", one mistake when you mention the nickname given by the allies to the Japanese aircrats. Wildcat is okay because they are referred that way by the side using and manufacturing them, but things can get complex for late war japanese aircraft in the same way it was for German vechicles. i.e. the Nakajima B6N is called "Jill" in allied reference, but also has its own official name "Tenzan" in Imperial Japanese Navy, so which one should be put in game? The Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf. B is called "Königstiger/King Tiger" in allied reference but there is no such official German name, yet we see that name in game. The Brümmbär is called "StuPa" by Germans as abbreviation from "Sturmpanzer", yet there is no "StuPa" in game. There should be a principal, but should not be a "must".
Early Japanese aircraft does not have nickname except their own index, while late designs always receive a dedicated official one, the same way as Panzer I~IV and early German assault gun/SPGs. An A5M Type 96 Fighter is a "96 Fighter", a Panzer IA is a "Panzer IA", but an A7M can also be a "Reppu" and a Panzerjäger(P) can also be an "Elefant".adiekmann wrote: ↑Tue Jul 13, 2021 6:06 pmJapanese aircraft nomenclature was somewhat confusing and that's why the nicknames from the Americans. But in this game you'll ultimately chose the aircraft by its stats, so you'll get used to it I think. Personally, I am not as familiar with them (other than Zero, Kate, and Val from early war) that it wouldn't make a big difference to me anyway.
Pacific is developed by another group, which is already said in the interview.SirAllan wrote: ↑Wed Jul 14, 2021 4:22 pm Im sure it will - the same devs cant focus on both directions at the same time, just like the germans two front war.
What might be even worse, the quality of the devs work will decrease cause of stress like the nerf of the paratroopers we allready have experianced as a result
Don't worry, buddy, who needs to read or look at the pictures )) So mind your own business, and I'll be my own, OK ( Лады ? )Khancotlette wrote: ↑Wed Jul 14, 2021 9:10 am Buddy, why do you constantly send books and links in Russian, do you really think anybody here would understand it or bother with google-translating all that stuff? I'm Russian myself, but I see no sense in it on an English-speaking forum, no offence
It was a fair question. A forum is not to mind your own business. But almost all of the links you post are of no value to almost all of the forum users, since they don't read/speak russian.uzbek2012 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 1:11 amDon't worry, buddy, who needs to read or look at the pictures )) So mind your own business, and I'll be my own, OK ( Лады ? )Khancotlette wrote: ↑Wed Jul 14, 2021 9:10 am Buddy, why do you constantly send books and links in Russian, do you really think anybody here would understand it or bother with google-translating all that stuff? I'm Russian myself, but I see no sense in it on an English-speaking forum, no offence
Yes, speak for yourself many people are watching many people are not watching this case and everyone's choice !pewp3w wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 6:22 amIt was a fair question. A forum is not to mind your own business. But almost all of the links you post are of no value to almost all of the forum users, since they don't read/speak russian.uzbek2012 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 1:11 amDon't worry, buddy, who needs to read or look at the pictures )) So mind your own business, and I'll be my own, OK ( Лады ? )Khancotlette wrote: ↑Wed Jul 14, 2021 9:10 am Buddy, why do you constantly send books and links in Russian, do you really think anybody here would understand it or bother with google-translating all that stuff? I'm Russian myself, but I see no sense in it on an English-speaking forum, no offence
Wonder how they handle Japanese not surrendering!uzbek2012 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 12:41 pm Yes, there will be a lot to do here, not like in Europe )
https://en.topwar.ru/25258-storozhevaya ... e-dno.html
Well, not all of them did refuse to surrender, after all Japan lost more than 1,5 million soldiers as PoWs. But there is a perk in the game, allowing the unit to become never-surrendering. I guess, giving that perk to the half or maybe third of Japanese units in each scenario would make sense
You can improve morale or other qualities ) And they still surrendered to captivity the same Kwantung army for example )Stephen1024 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 2:08 pmWonder how they handle Japanese not surrendering!uzbek2012 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 12:41 pm Yes, there will be a lot to do here, not like in Europe )
https://en.topwar.ru/25258-storozhevaya ... e-dno.html
Was insult for their honour to surrender so don't see how can have mass surrenders as in European theater. Some did but most preferred die.
How about there determination which would cause a heavy price for each victory allies gained.
Units losing just 1 here or there not what happened.
Also jungle is just as bad enemy.
With the beginning of the Manchurian operation, on August 16, 1945, the commander of the Kwantung Army, General Yamada Otozo, ordered his army to surrender, after Emperor Hirohito announced the surrender of Japan on August 14, 1945, some Japanese divisions refused to surrender, and fighting continued for the next few days.
During the Manchurian operation of the Soviet troops, the Kwantung Army lost about 84 thousand soldiers and officers killed, more than 15 thousand died of wounds and diseases on the territory of Manchuria, about 600 thousand people were captured, while the irretrievable losses of the Soviet Army amounted to about 12 thousand people.
