TDC - Archive

[Hari72]

Imperial League Div C

Hari72 Sassanid persian 591-628 47-38 beat wzfcns Northern Dynasties( Northern Zhou) 557-581AD 60 - 41

Thanks for the game.

[Zawzgrzyt]

Div A

challenges

Zawzgrzyt Andalusian 756-1049 vs snooky51 Dailami (928-1055 AD) w/ Armenian 885-1045 AD allies
Zawzgrzyt Andalusian 756-1049 vs Karvon Arab Conquest 629 AD

Pm sent

[Zawzgrzyt]

Div A

Zawzgrzyt Polish 1455-1500 w/ Hussite (Utraquist) 1419-1979 challenges Kroche Crusader 1155-1291AD w Syrian States allies 1090-1286AD

Pm sent

[anderarcos11]

anderarcos11 Roman 197-284 AD beat Fluidwil Visigothic 419-621, 57 to 26. Scoring is 91 to 26

Battle in which the terrain was very favorable to the Roman army, who positioned themselves in a narrow space between two large mountain ranges. The Visigothic troops advanced being worn down by Roman artillery and missile troops, although at the start of the battle a clash between several light troops was resolved in favor of the Visigothic army. The Romans tried to surround the mountains but they met a Visigoth cavalry greater in number and quality, so they were overwhelmed. However, the Roman army had its rear guard well protected with some legions in one narrow pass and auxiliaries and archers in another wooded pass. Finally, the attack of the legions on the right flank disrupted the Visigothic lines and achieved victory.

[Rosedelio]

Results so far



Div A: ericdoman1 is in first with harveylh a likely second. It'll be a close fight to see who gets third.

Div B: Hari72 is in the lead, though rpadilla1988 is also undefeated.

[anderarcos11]

Results so far



Div A: ericdoman1 is in first with harveylh a likely second. It'll be a close fight to see who gets third.

Div B: Hari72 is in the lead, though rpadilla1988 is also undefeated.

I think something must be wrong, my accounts give me 425.

89+80+24+87+44+25+76

[ericdoman1]

Anderarcos

415 is correct. You gave yourself 80 points vs IMC. It is 70. Another reason to just post the "raw score"

[anderarcos11]

Anderarcos

415 is correct. You gave yourself 80 points vs IMC. It is 70. Another reason to just post the "raw score"

The game with IMC is 54 to 27, win. If I'm not wrong, it's 54-27 (result 27). 27 + 60 (result 87).

I think you mean the game with wzfcns, that the result was 70-50. Which I guess is, 70-50 (result 20), 60+20 (result 80). I don't know where that 70 comes from.

[hscic]

Division C

hscic with Danish (1488-1500 A.D.) and Swedish (1397-1500 A.D.) allies defeated Afromullet German (City NW 1400-1449) - 55 - 60

German forces qualitatively inferior to the Danish ones took up positions on a hill. While the German cavalry and a part of the Danish one were facing on the plain, the outcome of the battle was uncertain for a long time. Eventually Danish landsknechts, the only surviving Danish infantry, managed to contain the German infantry while the Danish heavy cavalry got the better of the German one allowing the Danes to win by a narrow margin.
TY Wolfgang for the challenging match that, by the way, is my last one of this tournament. TY to the organizers.

[ericdoman1]

Anderarcos

415 is correct. You gave yourself 80 points vs IMC. It is 70. Another reason to just post the "raw score"

The game with IMC is 54 to 27, win. If I'm not wrong, it's 54-27 (result 27). 27 + 60 (result 87).

I think you mean the game with wzfcns, that the result was 70-50. Which I guess is, 70-50 (result 20), 60+20 (result 80). I don't know where that 70 comes from.

Ah yes, I meant wzfcns but you posted the score as

e: Eastern Medieval 1000 to 1500 AD - Posting Results
anderarcos11 Fatimid egyptian 1074-1171 AD with crusader 1155-1291 AD allies beat wzfcns Polish 1455-1500. 60 to 50, scoring 70 to 50. So Rosedelio and I took the 60 - 50 as the raw score

[anderarcos11]

Anderarcos

415 is correct. You gave yourself 80 points vs IMC. It is 70. Another reason to just post the "raw score"

The game with IMC is 54 to 27, win. If I'm not wrong, it's 54-27 (result 27). 27 + 60 (result 87).

I think you mean the game with wzfcns, that the result was 70-50. Which I guess is, 70-50 (result 20), 60+20 (result 80). I don't know where that 70 comes from.

Ah yes, I meant wzfcns but you posted the score as

e: Eastern Medieval 1000 to 1500 AD - Posting Results
anderarcos11 Fatimid egyptian 1074-1171 AD with crusader 1155-1291 AD allies beat wzfcns Polish 1455-1500. 60 to 50, scoring 70 to 50. So Rosedelio and I took the 60 - 50 as the raw score

True, I was wrong. Thank you!

[markleslie]

Division A

markleslie Sassanid Persian 224-349 AD with Arab (Bedouin) 300-636 AD allies defeated snooky51 Roman (425-492AD) w/ Hunnic (western) 376-454 AD allies 60-45.

[edb1815]

Division A

edb1815 (Bohemian Catholic 1450-1500 w/ Hungarian ally) challenges Kroche (Crusader 1155-1291AD w Syrian States allies 1090-1286AD)

PM sent

[edb1815]

Division B

edb1815 (Milanese 1440-1500) challenges Kroche (Aragonese 1450-79)

PM sent

[tyronec]

Division A

tyronec Northern Dynasties (Western Wei) 535-556
defeats
Bodhran Dacians 89-106 with Sarmatians 25-375 allies
44-13
Thanks for the game.
That is my last game complete for this period, thanks to the organisers.

[tyronec]

Division A

Tyronec ... Macedonian 355-329 with Greek 460-281 Allies
defeats
Questar17 ... Pontic 110-85
61-40
Thanks for the game.

That is me complete for Classical, good competition.

[wellsonian]

Div C

wellsonian (German/Swiss) defeats Anderarcos11 (Florentine) 42-12. Thanks for the fun battle! As usual with this game, it was closer than the score suggests.

[wellsonian]

Div C

wellsonian (German/Swiss) challenges Afromullet German (City) (NW) 1400-1449AD

Good luck! Password is mullet.

Pm sent.

[Morat]

Div B

Morat (Ostrogoths/German) beat frederic02 (Western Huns) 61-39

Ostrogoths came with lots of light troops to avoid their warbands being turned into pincushions by the Hunnic hordes. After some early manoeuvring (and a degree of staring at each other) both sides fought across the entire field. On the right the Huns had early success, disrupting the Ostrogoth horse and causing considerable casualties. In the centre and on the left Ostrogoth archers and shield wall started to break down their foes.

A great scrap gradually turned the Ostrogoth way - the durability of the shield wall and warbands being the key difference with backup from armoured lancers, In the end this was enough to get over the line.

Thanks to frederic02 for a really hard fought game.

M.

[tyronec]

Division A

tyronec German City (SE) 1375-1399 + Swiss 1360-1399
defeats
harveylh German (City) SE 1488-1500 AD & German (Feudal) 1490-1500 AD ally
63-48
Tough game, Harvey would likely have won in a few turns if it had continued.