This may sound silly, but is it anywhere near possible to add a "forced march" feature that would switchable, where infantry would get roughly 1.5x-2x movement points but would be suppressed for the rest of the turn (including AI turn), and more likely to be ambushed (suffer more losses if...

Looks pretty much random when they appear?
Just wondering if it can be predicted in some way, like one every 100 xp or so. Haven't really paid much attention to it.

You complaining about the Attack+4 and Movement+1...? Joking It happens. The only remedy\solution is to disband the unit, buy a new one and hope for the best. Definitely not recommended. I would complain about the +defense and +initiative on even being possible on artillery, but maybe that's just me...

HAX!

I've noticed this playing AK. Not only fighters but also land units, occasionally one zips out of nowhere and attack targets it shouldn't be seeing, and sometimes they also seem to ignore ZoC(?) I know how to place traps, do it often, and while mostly they work, sometimes i helplessly watch as a fig...

\0/ !

Left is enemy odds, right is your odds, bottom your attack strength (or unit HP)
if left is -3 right -3 means odds are both will lose 3 HP. 0-0 nothing will happen. -10 0 one shot kill with no losses.
This is just a rough estimate, however. Results can be completely different.

Chess. If youre in that plane of existence where good fortune just does't exist, there is no shame to it. When i attacked a lone dingo out in the open with a full strength PZ iv and lost 1:7, that was the final drop. The brits and their endless prestige pool, insanely tough Matildas that appear to N...

Sorry to dig this one out, but i had a successful run with a VERY simple tactic: camp :mrgreen: I camped the heck out of the soutwestern corner, just outside Baranovichi. Took me a couple tries to figure it out, but didn't lose a single unit. Holding an airfield is critical, and this is a great spot...